Loading...

Safeguarding Your Business from Employment Fraud 

by Alex Lvoff 4 min read January 18, 2024

It is a New Year and a new start. How about a new job? That is what thousands of employees will consider over the next month. It is also a time for employers to attract new talents, but they must be aware of different types of employment fraud. The rise of remote work has significantly increased the prevalence of remote hiring practices, from the initial job application to the onboarding process and beyond. Unfortunately, this shift has also opened the door to a surge in imposter employees, also known as ‘candidate fraud,’ posing a significant concern for organizations. 

How does employment identity theft happen? 

Instances of potential job candidates utilizing real-time deepfake video and deepfake audio, along with personally identifiable information (PII), during remote interviews to secure positions within American companies have been on the rise. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reports that fraudulent individuals often acquire PII through fake job opening posts, which enable them to gather candidate information and resumes. Surprisingly, the tools necessary for impersonation on live video calls do not require sophisticated or expensive hardware or software. 

Employment identity theft can occur in several ways. Here are a few examples: 

  1. Inaccurate credentials: Employers may inadvertently hire someone with false or stolen credentials if they fail to conduct comprehensive background checks. When the employer discovers the deception, it can be challenging to trace the true identity of the person they unknowingly hired. 
  2. Limited-term job offers: Some industries offer temporary job opportunities in distant locations. Individuals with criminal backgrounds may steal victims’ identities to apply for these jobs, hoping that their crimes will go unnoticed until after the job is complete. 
  3. Perpetrated by colleagues: In rare instances, jealous colleagues or coworkers can commit employment identity theft. They may steal a coworker’s information during a data breach and sell it on the dark web or use the victim’s credentials to frame them for fraudulent workplace actions. 

Preventing employment identity theft 

In addition to the reported cases of imposter employee fraud, it is crucial to acknowledge the potential for other scams that exploit new technologies and the prevalence of remote work. Malicious cyber attackers could secure employment using stolen credentials, enabling them to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data or company systems. A proficient hacker possessing the necessary IT skills may find it relatively easy to leverage social engineering techniques during the hiring process. 

Consequently, the reliability of traditional methods for employee verification, such as face-to-face interactions and personal recognition, is diminishing in the face of remote work and the technological advancements that enable individuals to manipulate their appearance, voice, and identity. 

To mitigate risks associated with hiring imposters, it is imperative to incorporate robust measures into the recruitment process. Here are some key considerations: 

  1. Establish clear policies and employment contracts: Clearly communicate your organization’s policies regarding moonlighting in employment contracts, employee handbooks, or other official documents.
  2. Confidentiality and non-compete agreements: Implement confidentiality and non-compete agreements to protect your company’s sensitive information and intellectual property.
  3. Monitoring: Automate employment and income verification of your employees. 
  4. Provide training on cybersecurity best practices: Educate employees about cyber-attacks and identity scams, such as phishing scams, through seminars and workplace training sessions.
  5. Implement robust security measures: Use firewalls, encrypt sensitive employee information, and limit access to personal data. Minimize the number of employees who have access to this information.
  6. Thoroughly screen new employees: Verify the accuracy of Social Security numbers and other information during the hiring process. Conduct comprehensive background checks, including checking bank account information and credit reports and fight against synthetic identities.
  7. Offer identity theft protection as a benefit: Consider providing identity theft protection services to your employees as part of their benefits package. These services can detect and alert victims of potential identity theft, facilitating a fast response. 

The new era of remote work necessitates a fresh perspective on the hiring process. It is crucial to reevaluate HR practices and leverage AI fraud detection technologies to ensure that the individuals you hire, and employ are who they claim to be, guarding against the infiltration of imposters. 

Navigating employment fraud with effective solutions 

Employment fraud presents significant risks and challenges for employers, including conflicts of interest, reputation damage, and breaches of confidentiality. By taking the right preventative measures, you can safeguard your organization and employees.  

Streamlining the hiring process is essential to remain competitive. But how do you balance the need for speed and ease of use with essential ID checks?  By combining the best data with our automated ID verification processes, Experian helps you protect your business and onboard new talents efficiently. Our best-in-class solutions employ device recognition, behavioral biometrics, machine learning and global fraud databases to spot and block suspicious activity before it becomes a problem. 

*This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.

Related Posts

For many banks, first-party fraud has become a silent drain on profitability. On paper, it often looks like classic credit risk: an account books, goes delinquent, and ultimately charges off. But a growing share of those early charge-offs is driven by something else entirely: customers who never intended to pay you back. That distinction matters. When first-party fraud is misclassified as credit risk, banks risk overstating credit loss, understating fraud exposure, and missing opportunities to intervene earlier.  In our recent Consumer Banker Association (CBA) partner webinar, “Fraud or Financial Distress? How to Differentiate Fraud and Credit Risk Early,” Experian shared new data and analytics to help fraud, risk and collections leaders see this problem more clearly. This post summarizes key themes from the webinar and points you to the full report and on-demand webinar for deeper insight. Why first-party fraud is a growing issue for banks  Banks are seeing rising early losses, especially in digital channels. But those losses do not always behave like traditional credit deterioration. Several trends are contributing:  More accounts opened and funded digitally  Increased use of synthetic or manipulated identities  Economic pressure on consumers and small businesses  More sophisticated misuse of legitimate credentials  When these patterns are lumped into credit risk, banks can experience:  Inflation of credit loss estimates and reserves  Underinvestment in fraud controls and analytics  Blurred visibility into what is truly driving performance   Treating first-party fraud as a distinct problem is the first step toward solving it.  First-payment default: a clearer view of intent  Traditional credit models are designed to answer, “Can this customer pay?” and “How likely are they to roll into delinquency over time?” They are not designed to answer, “Did this customer ever intend to pay?” To help banks get closer to that question, Experian uses first-payment default (FPD) as a key indicator. At a high level, FPD focuses on accounts that become seriously delinquent early in their lifecycle and do not meaningfully recover.  The principle is straightforward:  A legitimate borrower under stress is more likely to miss payments later, with periods of cure and relapse.  A first-party fraudster is more likely to default quickly and never get back on track.  By focusing on FPD patterns, banks can start to separate cases that look like genuine financial distress from those that are more consistent with deceptive intent.  The full report explains how FPD is defined, how it varies by product, and how it can be used to sharpen bank fraud and credit strategies. Beyond FPD: building a richer fraud signal  FPD alone is not enough to classify first-party fraud. In practice, leading banks are layering FPD with behavioral, application and identity indicators to build a more reliable picture. At a conceptual level, these indicators can include:  Early delinquency and straight-roll behavior  Utilization and credit mix that do not align with stated profile  Unusual income, employment, or application characteristics High-risk channels, devices, or locations at application Patterns of disputes or behaviors that suggest abuse  The power comes from how these signals interact, not from any one data point. The report and webinar walk through how these indicators can be combined into fraud analytics and how they perform across key banking products.  Why it matters across fraud, credit and collections Getting first-party fraud right is not just about fraud loss. It impacts multiple parts of the bank. Fraud strategy Well-defined quantification of first-party fraud helps fraud leaders make the case for investments in identity verification, device intelligence, and other early lifecycle controls, especially in digital account opening and digital lending. Credit risk and capital planning When fraud and credit losses are blended, credit models and reserves can be distorted. Separating first-party fraud provides risk teams a cleaner view of true credit performance and supports better capital planning.  Collections and customer treatment Customers in genuine financial distress need different treatment paths than those who never intended to pay. Better segmentation supports more appropriate outreach, hardship programs, and collections strategies, while reserving firmer actions for abuse.  Executive and board reporting Leadership teams increasingly want to understand what portion of loss is being driven by fraud versus credit. Credible data improves discussions around risk appetite and return on capital.  What leading banks are doing differently  In our work with financial institutions, several common practices have emerged among banks that are getting ahead of first-party fraud: 1. Defining first-party fraud explicitly They establish clear definitions and tracking for first-party fraud across key products instead of leaving it buried in credit loss categories.  2. Embedding FPD segmentation into analytics They use FPD-based views in their monitoring and reporting, particularly in the first 6–12 months on book, to better understand early loss behavior.  3. Unifying fraud and credit decisioning Rather than separate strategies that may conflict, they adopt a more unified decisioning framework that considers both fraud and credit risk when approving accounts, setting limits and managing exposure.  4. Leveraging identity and device data They bring in noncredit data — identity risk, device intelligence, application behavior — to complement traditional credit information and strengthen models.  5. Benchmarking performance against peers They use external benchmarks for first-party fraud loss rates and incident sizes to calibrate their risk posture and investment decisions.  The post is meant as a high-level overview. The real value for your teams will be in the detailed benchmarks, charts and examples in the full report and the discussion in the webinar.  If your teams are asking whether rising early losses are driven by fraud or financial distress, this is the moment to look deeper at first-party fraud.  Download the report: “First-party fraud: The most common culprit”  Explore detailed benchmarks for first-party fraud across banking products, see how first-payment default and other indicators are defined and applied, and review examples you can bring into your own internal discussions.  Download the report Watch the on-demand CBA webinar: “Fraud or Financial Distress? How to Differentiate Fraud and Credit Risk Early”  Hear Experian experts walk through real bank scenarios, FPD analytics and practical steps for integrating first-party fraud intelligence into your fraud, credit, and collections strategies.  Watch the webinar First-party fraud is likely already embedded in your early credit losses. With the right analytics and definitions, banks can uncover the true drivers, reduce hidden fraud exposure, and better support customers facing genuine financial hardship.

by Brittany Ennis 4 min read February 12, 2026

Discover why Experian’s unified fraud prevention platform, backed by decades of data stewardship and AI innovation, is the trusted choice for enterprises seeking scalable, compliant, and transparent identity verification solutions.

by Laura Davis 4 min read December 8, 2025

Learn how you can mitigate e-commerce fraud with identity verification and fraud prevention best practices.

by Theresa Nguyen 4 min read December 3, 2025